Market Gains in Clayton County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 457
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Clayton County, Iowa totaled $6,156,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kevin Duane Baumgartner | Strawberry Point, IA 52076 | $137,531 |
2 | Green Acres | Monona, IA 52159 | $136,671 |
3 | Douglas Allen Baumgartner | Strawberry Point, IA 52076 | $135,622 |
4 | Kris Joseph Lau | Guttenberg, IA 52052 | $134,516 |
5 | Roger Dean Wettleson | Postville, IA 52162 | $128,552 |
6 | Ronald Keith Mccartney | Elgin, IA 52141 | $103,783 |
7 | Michael Wayne Butikofer | Monona, IA 52159 | $97,468 |
8 | Michael Linn Bentien | Monona, IA 52159 | $96,819 |
9 | Craig David Embretson | Farmersburg, IA 52047 | $93,300 |
10 | Douglas Dwight Little | Farmersburg, IA 52047 | $89,451 |
11 | Brent Scott Carlson | Saint Olaf, IA 52072 | $80,939 |
12 | Cheryl Lynn Carlson | Saint Olaf, IA 52072 | $78,945 |
13 | Dennis Leroy Eberhardt | Elkader, IA 52043 | $76,059 |
14 | Ham O Lot Farms Inc | Monona, IA 52159 | $72,983 |
15 | David Orville Wilker | Elkader, IA 52043 | $67,558 |
16 | Kenneth Mark Faust | Colesburg, IA 52035 | $66,488 |
17 | Johnson Brothers | Elkader, IA 52043 | $65,268 |
18 | David Harold Vogt | Farmersburg, IA 52047 | $63,552 |
19 | Michael L Oberbroeckling Declaration Of Trust Date | Garnavillo, IA 52049 | $61,052 |
20 | David Wynthein | Arlington, IA 50606 | $60,213 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>