Farm Subsidy information
Floyd County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Floyd County, Iowa, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,396
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $36,444,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Deanne Kay Knapp | Charles City, IA 50616 | $174,166 |
| 22 | Desal Inc | Dougherty, IA 50433 | $169,575 |
| 23 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $168,065 |
| 24 | A & J Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $167,501 |
| 25 | Slk Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $163,570 |
| 26 | Brittany Barlow | Nashua, IA 50658 | $163,498 |
| 27 | Chambers Cattle And Grain Ltd | Charles City, IA 50616 | $161,672 |
| 28 | Boyd Alan Campbell | Rudd, IA 50471 | $159,295 |
| 29 | Murray Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $156,028 |
| 30 | Thomas J Staudt | Dougherty, IA 50433 | $154,100 |
| 31 | Lorrie L Staudt | Dougherty, IA 50433 | $153,627 |
| 32 | Dean J Jensen | Greene, IA 50636 | $152,019 |
| 33 | Rodney James Frascht | Charles City, IA 50616 | $150,532 |
| 34 | Brandon Anthony Wood | Rudd, IA 50471 | $150,400 |
| 35 | Larry Dean Bortz | Rudd, IA 50471 | $147,724 |
| 36 | Dean Henry Holzer | Charles City, IA 50616 | $146,930 |
| 37 | Michael J Ruzicka | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $144,989 |
| 38 | Dvk Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $144,642 |
| 39 | Robert Matthew Peterson | Ionia, IA 50645 | $141,642 |
| 40 | Jorgensen Farms Enterprises, Inc | Rudd, IA 50471 | $140,237 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf