Total Disaster Programs in Floyd County, Iowa, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 128
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $1,245,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | L & L Staudt LLC | Rockford, IA 50468 | $73,560 |
| 2 | Adam Lee Barlow | Nashua, IA 50658 | $59,302 |
| 3 | Engels Farms Inc | Greene, IA 50636 | $47,456 |
| 4 | A & J Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $45,362 |
| 5 | Florence Mary Beek | Mason City, IA 50401 | $42,409 |
| 6 | Barry J Zimmer | Charles City, IA 50616 | $34,504 |
| 7 | Alvin Michael Marth | Rockford, IA 50468 | $32,926 |
| 8 | Frascht Diversified LLC | Charles City, IA 50616 | $32,368 |
| 9 | Debra Ann Barlow | Nashua, IA 50658 | $32,204 |
| 10 | Brittany Barlow | Nashua, IA 50658 | $30,646 |
| 11 | Robert E Engels | Rockford, IA 50468 | $29,510 |
| 12 | Randy H Heise | Charles City, IA 50616 | $28,883 |
| 13 | Tjaden Fms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $26,650 |
| 14 | Philip T Burk | Holstein, IA 51025 | $23,646 |
| 15 | Scott Charles Gabel | Rockford, IA 50468 | $23,537 |
| 16 | Fox Family Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $23,460 |
| 17 | Rottinghaus Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $20,604 |
| 18 | David Marvin Knecht | Charles City, IA 50616 | $18,496 |
| 19 | Duane J Ritter | Charles City, IA 50616 | $18,249 |
| 20 | Lyle P Staudt | Charles City, IA 50616 | $16,611 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf