Oilseed Program in Hamilton County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,160
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in Hamilton County, Iowa totaled $2,727,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shelton Hay Ag 2019 | Panora, IA 50216 | $26,064 |
| 2 | Snb Farm Partnership | Webster City, IA 50595 | $24,366 |
| 3 | Hills Maple Crest Fms Ptn | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $21,319 |
| 4 | Van Diest Farms Inc | Webster City, IA 50595 | $20,282 |
| 5 | Gourley Bros L C | Webster City, IA 50595 | $18,841 |
| 6 | Max R Fonken | Williams, IA 50271 | $18,734 |
| 7 | Carlson Gr & Lvstk Inc | Vincent, IA 50594 | $18,155 |
| 8 | Groves Brothers Inc | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $17,006 |
| 9 | Stark Agriculture Inc | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $16,681 |
| 10 | Elkin Farms Inc | Webster City, IA 50595 | $16,093 |
| 11 | Berg Farms Inc | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $15,258 |
| 12 | Joan E Stark Revocable Trust | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $13,948 |
| 13 | B & H Turkey Farms | Radcliffe, IA 50230 | $13,855 |
| 14 | Eric Doolittle | Williams, IA 50271 | $13,299 |
| 15 | Wayne Bernard Neuman | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $12,577 |
| 16 | Bruce Wilson | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $12,535 |
| 17 | Hill Bros Fm | Webster City, IA 50595 | $12,324 |
| 18 | Laurel Kent Thomas | Williams, IA 50271 | $12,038 |
| 19 | Westrum Farms Inc | Stratford, IA 50249 | $11,939 |
| 20 | Gordon Quam | Boone, IA 50036 | $11,909 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf