Farm Subsidy information
Howard County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Howard County, Iowa, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 979
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Howard County, Iowa totaled $14,614,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Marvin Praska | Cresco, IA 52136 | $17,666 |
142 | Rita Marie Durchenwald | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $17,666 |
143 | Dale Frank Praska | Gillette, WY 82716 | $17,666 |
144 | Lawrence Joseph Praska | Bondurant, IA 50035 | $17,666 |
145 | Elizabeth A Christensen | Hudson, WI 54016 | $17,651 |
146 | Lichty Farms No 1 LLC | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $17,628 |
147 | Clem Havlik | Elma, IA 50628 | $17,582 |
148 | Robert N Anderlik | Boone, IA 50036 | $17,524 |
149 | David William Martinek | Cresco, IA 52136 | $17,137 |
150 | James A Wolfe | Cresco, IA 52136 | $16,606 |
151 | Darrick Allen Burnikel | Cresco, IA 52136 | $16,591 |
152 | Kenneth Douglas Flugum | Riceville, IA 50466 | $16,579 |
153 | Randall D Mitchell | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $16,547 |
154 | Susanne Okada | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $16,534 |
155 | Janine K Schwarck | Riceville, IA 50466 | $16,416 |
156 | C John Schwarck | Riceville, IA 50466 | $16,416 |
157 | Scott R Webb | Cresco, IA 52136 | $16,400 |
158 | Joseph Henry Thraenert | Elma, IA 50628 | $16,363 |
159 | Elizabeth Ann Schwade | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $16,352 |
160 | Robert Willard Fett | Elma, IA 50628 | $16,274 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”