Farm Subsidy information
Howard County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Howard County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,280
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Howard County, Iowa totaled $429,186,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pinicon Farm | Mc Intire, IA 50455 | $3,390,351 |
2 | Saratoga Partnership | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $3,161,275 |
3 | Sovereigns Inc | Cresco, IA 52136 | $2,891,402 |
4 | D R S G Partnership | Cresco, IA 52136 | $2,871,715 |
5 | Ludwig Farms | Elma, IA 50628 | $2,078,248 |
6 | Kmax Farms LLC | Elma, IA 50628 | $2,006,580 |
7 | Kenneth Charles Moellers | Cresco, IA 52136 | $1,985,245 |
8 | Paris Foods Inc | Cresco, IA 52136 | $1,949,790 |
9 | Michael Joseph Fox | Riceville, IA 50466 | $1,689,291 |
10 | Randall William Smith | Cresco, IA 52136 | $1,679,514 |
11 | Neubauer Farms Inc | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $1,623,145 |
12 | Grover Farm Corporation | Hudson, IA 50643 | $1,567,599 |
13 | Thomas Francis Shatek | Elma, IA 50628 | $1,525,158 |
14 | Gregory Mark Mahr | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $1,500,336 |
15 | Wayne Joseph Mlady | Cresco, IA 52136 | $1,468,008 |
16 | Donna M Smith Rev Trust | Elma, IA 50628 | $1,465,607 |
17 | Michael Dale Lewis | Chester, IA 52134 | $1,392,071 |
18 | Gansen L C | Elma, IA 50628 | $1,373,387 |
19 | Pine Creek Farm Ltd | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $1,343,856 |
20 | Max Sylvester Schmidt | Elma, IA 50628 | $1,326,224 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>