Counter Cyclical Program in Ida County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 724
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Ida County, Iowa totaled $8,683,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cranston Bros Joint Venture | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $125,024 |
| 2 | Meyer Brothers Partnership | Holstein, IA 51025 | $124,640 |
| 3 | Ashton Valley Farms Partnership | Holstein, IA 51025 | $104,982 |
| 4 | Roger L Groth | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $91,072 |
| 5 | Phyllis E Groth | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $91,044 |
| 6 | Volkert Brothers | Holstein, IA 51025 | $81,504 |
| 7 | Ruser & Cipperley | Holstein, IA 51025 | $72,492 |
| 8 | Jerry Allen Groth | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $70,702 |
| 9 | Goodenow Livestock Co | Washington, DC 20012 | $68,343 |
| 10 | Ken Wulf & Sons Inc | Holstein, IA 51025 | $63,040 |
| 11 | Lindgren Farms Ltd | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $62,838 |
| 12 | Dale Alan Schumacher | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $58,603 |
| 13 | Alan Bruce Bennett | Galva, IA 51020 | $58,368 |
| 14 | Troy Donavon Hare | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $55,945 |
| 15 | Conover Bros Inc | Holstein, IA 51025 | $55,904 |
| 16 | Mason James Fleenor | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $54,904 |
| 17 | Dennis Dwaine Bubke | Holstein, IA 51025 | $53,766 |
| 18 | Brian Keith Wolterman | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $53,371 |
| 19 | Robert L Butcher | Holstein, IA 51025 | $52,836 |
| 20 | Vohs Brothers Inc | Holstein, IA 51025 | $52,621 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf