Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 35
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $83,875 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bruce David De Bruin | Pella, IA 50219 | $6,136 |
2 | Everett G Jansen Revocable Trust | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $4,419 |
3 | Ann Thorp | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $3,802 |
4 | Augustine & Sons Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $3,500 |
5 | J Mcdonough Trust | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $3,500 |
6 | Jacob G Hols Estate | Fremont, IA 52561 | $3,500 |
7 | Lyle E Nunnikhoven | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $3,500 |
8 | Francis Bunting | Barnes City, IA 50027 | $3,500 |
9 | Roger Stout | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $3,500 |
10 | Cleo Dunkin | Pella, IA 50219 | $3,500 |
11 | Helen Bennink Trust | Phoenix, AZ 85032 | $3,457 |
12 | C John Crill | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $3,389 |
13 | Sandra F Saylor | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $3,194 |
14 | Graneva Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $2,825 |
15 | Harry Johnson | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $2,793 |
16 | John Kloosterman | Pella, IA 50219 | $2,525 |
17 | Gary Walston | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $2,442 |
18 | Ivan Baker | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $2,407 |
19 | Howard Augustine | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $2,236 |
20 | Arlen Eggerling Revocable Trust | Pella, IA 50219 | $1,931 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>