Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Osceola County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 505
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Osceola County, Iowa totaled $17,680,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hergus Valley Inc | Sibley, IA 51249 | $750,000 |
2 | Stony Creek Pork Company | Harris, IA 51345 | $500,000 |
3 | Dart Enterprises LLC | Sibley, IA 51249 | $325,922 |
4 | Nustar Farms LLC | Sibley, IA 51249 | $283,214 |
5 | Clark Partnership | Sibley, IA 51249 | $280,114 |
6 | Patrick L Eddy | Sibley, IA 51249 | $250,000 |
7 | Absolute Construction Inc | Sibley, IA 51249 | $250,000 |
8 | Paul H Feldkamp Ltd | Sibley, IA 51249 | $249,789 |
9 | Bruce A Lorch Inc | Ocheyedan, IA 51354 | $247,357 |
10 | Tkc Farms Inc | Sibley, IA 51249 | $242,701 |
11 | T J Pork Inc | Ocheyedan, IA 51354 | $228,367 |
12 | Katie F Morgan | Archer, IA 51231 | $216,660 |
13 | D & D Swine Ltd | Melvin, IA 51350 | $216,031 |
14 | Sff Ag | Ocheyedan, IA 51354 | $197,536 |
15 | Brockshus Dairy LLC | Ocheyedan, IA 51354 | $185,485 |
16 | Regal Pork LLC | Ocheyedan, IA 51354 | $166,681 |
17 | Jim Sarringar | Sibley, IA 51249 | $165,226 |
18 | Keith Alan Zylstra | Sibley, IA 51249 | $161,297 |
19 | Chad M Jager | Ashton, IA 51232 | $158,905 |
20 | Eddy Farms Inc | Sibley, IA 51249 | $148,885 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>