Total Commodity Programs in Sioux County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,221
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sioux County, Iowa totaled $19,944,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vermeer & Sons Farms | Maurice, IA 51036 | $769,896 |
| 2 | Farmers Coop Society- Sioux Center Ia &wh& | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $609,173 |
| 3 | Hds Farms LLC | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $505,963 |
| 4 | Black Soil Dairy LLC | Granville, IA 51022 | $470,132 |
| 5 | Rolling View Farms Inc | Orange City, IA 51041 | $349,311 |
| 6 | Titan Swine | Ireton, IA 51027 | $250,000 |
| 7 | Bomgaars Farms Inc | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $199,099 |
| 8 | Ferdsons Family Farms Inc | Hull, IA 51239 | $179,655 |
| 9 | Fairview Feeders Inc | Inwood, IA 51240 | $178,063 |
| 10 | J Maassen & Sons | Maurice, IA 51036 | $169,128 |
| 11 | Kooiker Dairy Farms Inc | Orange City, IA 51041 | $165,813 |
| 12 | Southeast Holdings Inc | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $161,456 |
| 13 | Dry Creek Farms Inc | Rock Valley, IA 51247 | $155,107 |
| 14 | Ja-le Inc | Hull, IA 51239 | $137,259 |
| 15 | Wolfswinkel Dairy Inc | Rock Valley, IA 51247 | $137,225 |
| 16 | De Hoog Dairy Farm LLC | Ireton, IA 51027 | $137,142 |
| 17 | Oolman Pork LLC | Orange City, IA 51041 | $136,615 |
| 18 | Nyhof Dairy Inc | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $135,552 |
| 19 | Mtf Farms Inc | Doon, IA 51235 | $133,963 |
| 20 | Fluit Dairy Inc | Hull, IA 51239 | $132,331 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf