Market Gains in Wayne County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 134
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Wayne County, Iowa totaled $1,786,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roy Edward Reno | Humeston, IA 50123 | $180,874 |
| 2 | Oak Hills Ranch Inc | Mercer, MO 64661 | $127,900 |
| 3 | Porter Farms Inc | Mercer, MO 64661 | $127,900 |
| 4 | Jerrie Everett Fetters | Seymour, IA 52590 | $107,976 |
| 5 | Rickie Lee Reno | Humeston, IA 50123 | $85,702 |
| 6 | Donald Keith Davis Jr | Corydon, IA 50060 | $53,999 |
| 7 | Charles William Storm | Humeston, IA 50123 | $51,851 |
| 8 | Jeffrey Duane Hamilton | Corydon, IA 50060 | $51,475 |
| 9 | Barry Gene Andrews | Allerton, IA 50008 | $46,486 |
| 10 | Randall Dean Rouse Sole Proprietorship | Allerton, IA 50008 | $46,000 |
| 11 | Chad Lynn King | Allerton, IA 50008 | $44,598 |
| 12 | Jill Amy King | Corydon, IA 50060 | $44,598 |
| 13 | Thomas Ross Swearingin | Corydon, IA 50060 | $44,334 |
| 14 | Raymond Henry Berner | Seymour, IA 52590 | $39,065 |
| 15 | Jimmy Lee Shields | Lineville, IA 50147 | $34,349 |
| 16 | Max Dwight Moore | Russell, IA 50238 | $33,094 |
| 17 | David L Cobb Revocable Living Trust | Seymour, IA 52590 | $32,235 |
| 18 | Kevin Eugene Andrews | Allerton, IA 50008 | $29,897 |
| 19 | Brent Lee Werts | Russell, IA 50238 | $29,180 |
| 20 | Donald Lee Petty | Allerton, IA 50008 | $28,629 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf