Loan Deficiency in Winnebago County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 844
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Winnebago County, Iowa totaled $29,639,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | D & J Winkleman Farms Inc | West Unity, OH 43570 | $334,913 |
| 2 | Howard Earl Julius | Buffalo Center, IA 50424 | $272,431 |
| 3 | Ostermann Farmstead Inc | Buffalo Center, IA 50424 | $264,140 |
| 4 | Ostrander Farms Inc | Thompson, IA 50478 | $245,155 |
| 5 | Harvey Burton Asmus Estate | Rake, IA 50465 | $234,359 |
| 6 | Pederson Farms Inc | Lake Mills, IA 50450 | $233,682 |
| 7 | Russell E Meyering | Woden, IA 50484 | $231,675 |
| 8 | Steven W Abele | Lake Mills, IA 50450 | $214,360 |
| 9 | Darold Schleuger Farms | Forest City, IA 50436 | $214,355 |
| 10 | Brent Douglas Matson | Buffalo Center, IA 50424 | $214,265 |
| 11 | Douglas Swingen | Woden, IA 50484 | $212,960 |
| 12 | Helm Farms Inc | Forest City, IA 50436 | $210,957 |
| 13 | Mark D Hanna | Joice, IA 50446 | $208,719 |
| 14 | John A Eilertson | Kiester, MN 56051 | $204,673 |
| 15 | David Walter Sachs | Lakota, IA 50451 | $200,984 |
| 16 | Graber Farms Inc | Forest City, IA 50436 | $196,623 |
| 17 | Lewis Grain & Livestock Co | Forest City, IA 50436 | $195,850 |
| 18 | Alan D Flugum | Lake Mills, IA 50450 | $191,930 |
| 19 | Imo Farms Inc | Thompson, IA 50478 | $189,195 |
| 20 | Blt Farms Ltd | Joice, IA 50446 | $189,188 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf