Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Bourbon County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 261
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Bourbon County, Kansas totaled $1,018,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wyatt Joseph Harris | Hepler, KS 66746 | $55,894 |
| 2 | G-three LLC | Uniontown, KS 66779 | $46,232 |
| 3 | Kenneth Lee Snyder | Fulton, KS 66738 | $43,185 |
| 4 | Dennis J Meech Dba Triple M Farms | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $36,138 |
| 5 | Joe Warren | Uniontown, KS 66779 | $31,621 |
| 6 | Roger Bradford | Bronson, KS 66716 | $29,646 |
| 7 | Brian D Snyder | Mapleton, KS 66754 | $29,064 |
| 8 | Muddy Water Farms LLC | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $28,630 |
| 9 | Jason Koch | Uniontown, KS 66779 | $27,569 |
| 10 | Mill Creek Cattle Co | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $25,599 |
| 11 | Johnathan M Franklin | Hepler, KS 66746 | $22,025 |
| 12 | Shanna Marie Harris | Hepler, KS 66746 | $21,772 |
| 13 | Wimmer Grain LLC | Fulton, KS 66738 | $17,917 |
| 14 | Maven Ag Partners LLC | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $17,580 |
| 15 | Ericson Farms LLC | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $17,138 |
| 16 | Joseph Phillip Wimmer | Fulton, KS 66738 | $16,365 |
| 17 | Edward L Karleskint | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $16,339 |
| 18 | Mark Bohlken | Garland, KS 66741 | $16,266 |
| 19 | Joseph J Peine | Fulton, KS 66738 | $15,565 |
| 20 | Brent Emmerson | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $15,424 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf