Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Chase County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 136
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $3,326,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Donnie R Swift | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $47,103 |
22 | Soyez Brothers LLC | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $46,998 |
23 | Cedar Creek Ranch Inc | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $46,602 |
24 | Billy L Burton | Emporia, KS 66801 | $40,700 |
25 | Doug Cahoone | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $40,521 |
26 | Daniel E Nurnberg | Emporia, KS 66801 | $37,764 |
27 | Wesley Cahoone | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $36,307 |
28 | Guy Pickard | Prairie Village, KS 66208 | $34,925 |
29 | Jerrold D Odle | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $34,375 |
30 | Shawn Potts | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $31,503 |
31 | Joe E Heathman | Matfield Grn, KS 66862 | $31,075 |
32 | John E Soyez | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $29,014 |
33 | William Soyez | Florence, KS 66851 | $28,560 |
34 | Larry Kohr | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $28,104 |
35 | Wildcat Ranch LLC | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $27,405 |
36 | Neal Nurnberg | Emporia, KS 66801 | $27,303 |
37 | Bar W Bar Corporation | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $23,629 |
38 | Stout Cattle Company | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $23,485 |
39 | Frank R Soyez | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $22,844 |
40 | Crawford Cattle LLC | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $22,499 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”