Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Chase County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 91
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $685,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Palenske Ranch Inc | Strong City, KS 66869 | $58,300 |
2 | Heathman Farms LLC | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $51,313 |
3 | Giger Land And Cattle Corporation | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $44,594 |
4 | Steve Eidman | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $37,754 |
5 | Eidman Farms LLC | Emporia, KS 66801 | $34,836 |
6 | Larry Soyez | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $27,830 |
7 | Keith J Glanville Rev Trust | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $26,380 |
8 | Soyez Brothers LLC | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $25,806 |
9 | Pretzer Farms | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $24,746 |
10 | Howard D Nurnberg Rev Trust | Emporia, KS 66801 | $23,271 |
11 | Daniel E Nurnberg | Emporia, KS 66801 | $18,360 |
12 | Doug Cahoone | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $16,265 |
13 | Larry Kohr | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $16,060 |
14 | Joe E Heathman | Matfield Grn, KS 66862 | $16,036 |
15 | Harshman Land & Cattle LLC | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $15,652 |
16 | Neal Nurnberg | Emporia, KS 66801 | $15,060 |
17 | Shawn Potts | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $13,250 |
18 | William Soyez | Florence, KS 66851 | $13,124 |
19 | John E Soyez | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $11,708 |
20 | Silver Creek Dairy Inc | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $11,585 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>