Deficiency Payment in Chase County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 216
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $157,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Palenske Ranch Inc | Strong City, KS 66869 | $15,306 |
2 | David B Mercer Inc | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $8,015 |
3 | Alfred Titus | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $5,713 |
4 | Wittker Farms | Strong City, KS 66869 | $5,094 |
5 | Kaltenbacher Charitable Trust | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $3,754 |
6 | H C Pendergraft Jr | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $3,217 |
7 | Alan D Giger | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $2,982 |
8 | Raymond Barrett | Emporia, KS 66801 | $2,947 |
9 | John Lind | Emporia, KS 66801 | $2,744 |
10 | Charles Pretzer | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $2,712 |
11 | Rogler Inc | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $2,551 |
12 | Frank R Soyez | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $2,367 |
13 | Orval E Cowan | Watonga, OK 73772 | $2,284 |
14 | Ks State University | Parsons, KS 67357 | $2,223 |
15 | Bar W Bar Corporation | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $2,196 |
16 | Steve Eidman | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $2,104 |
17 | Elmore Stout | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $2,065 |
18 | Dudley - Dudley Dona J Donahue | Durham, KS 67438 | $1,994 |
19 | James C Donahue | Durham, KS 67438 | $1,993 |
20 | Timothy-timothy Patr P Donahue | Lincolnville, KS 66858 | $1,993 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>