Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Chase County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 163
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $157,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Palenske Ranch Inc | Strong City, KS 66869 | $10,854 |
| 2 | Heathman Farms LLC | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $10,805 |
| 3 | Giger Land And Cattle Corporation | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $10,300 |
| 4 | Larry Soyez | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $10,140 |
| 5 | Soyez Brothers LLC | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $8,090 |
| 6 | Larry Kohr | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $7,513 |
| 7 | Doug Cahoone | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $7,436 |
| 8 | Pretzer Farms | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $6,884 |
| 9 | Keith J Glanville Rev Trust | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $5,057 |
| 10 | Howard D Nurnberg Rev Trust | Emporia, KS 66801 | $4,046 |
| 11 | Daniel E Nurnberg | Emporia, KS 66801 | $3,998 |
| 12 | Joe E Heathman | Matfield Grn, KS 66862 | $3,653 |
| 13 | Mushrush Ranches LLC | Strong City, KS 66869 | $3,549 |
| 14 | John E Soyez | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $3,425 |
| 15 | Pioneer Ranch Lc | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $3,004 |
| 16 | Wittker Farms LLC | Strong City, KS 66869 | $2,631 |
| 17 | Frank R Soyez | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $2,458 |
| 18 | Hannigan Hay And Grain LLC | Strong City, KS 66869 | $2,176 |
| 19 | Charles Tom Jones | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $1,698 |
| 20 | William Soyez | Florence, KS 66851 | $1,691 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf