Loan Deficiency in Dickinson County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,020
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Dickinson County, Kansas totaled $18,734,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jared O Hoover Family Trust | Abilene, KS 67410 | $75,452 |
42 | William J Haslouer Trust | Hope, KS 67451 | $74,939 |
43 | David Wood | Solomon, KS 67480 | $74,134 |
44 | Gary Stroda | Hope, KS 67451 | $72,852 |
45 | Ronald J Anderes | Hope, KS 67451 | $72,620 |
46 | John S Calovich Family Trust Indenture | Chapman, KS 67431 | $72,153 |
47 | Steven H Kohman Revocable Trust | Abilene, KS 67410 | $71,320 |
48 | Donald D Phillips | Hope, KS 67451 | $68,778 |
49 | Phillip Lorson | Hope, KS 67451 | $67,548 |
50 | Joseph L Miller | Enterprise, KS 67441 | $66,949 |
51 | Dan Falen | Hope, KS 67451 | $66,918 |
52 | Beemer & Beemer Partnership | Abilene, KS 67410 | $66,623 |
53 | William V Steinford Revocable Trust | Wakefield, KS 67487 | $66,262 |
54 | Gordon Kuntz | Abilene, KS 67410 | $64,655 |
55 | John Mayes Jr | Abilene, KS 67410 | $64,502 |
56 | Gerald E And Marcile M Shippy Trust | Woodbine, KS 67492 | $64,105 |
57 | Kenneth R Livingston | Abilene, KS 67410 | $63,658 |
58 | Kevin Howie | Abilene, KS 67410 | $63,442 |
59 | Neal-neal And Angela Barten | Abilene, KS 67410 | $63,300 |
60 | Kim L Goracke | Hope, KS 67451 | $62,932 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”