Market Gains in Geary County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 27
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Geary County, Kansas totaled $159,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hildebrand Farms Inc | Junction City, KS 66441 | $47,908 |
| 2 | Kramer Bros | Junction City, KS 66441 | $23,743 |
| 3 | Strauss Farms Inc | Junction City, KS 66441 | $18,807 |
| 4 | George E Poland Trust | Junction City, KS 66441 | $15,699 |
| 5 | Gary Luttman | Wakefield, KS 67487 | $15,643 |
| 6 | Bar-box Ranch Inc | Alta Vista, KS 66834 | $11,104 |
| 7 | James J Waters | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $10,693 |
| 8 | Carr Farms | Junction City, KS 66441 | $2,957 |
| 9 | Erichsen Harvesting LLC | Junction City, KS 66441 | $2,133 |
| 10 | Patrick A Beavers | Junction City, KS 66441 | $1,765 |
| 11 | Michael W Gfeller | Junction City, KS 66441 | $1,600 |
| 12 | Wayne Gfeller | Junction City, KS 66441 | $1,460 |
| 13 | Dallas Luttman | Wakefield, KS 67487 | $930 |
| 14 | John D & Susan I Moyer Trust | Junction City, KS 66441 | $738 |
| 15 | Poland Farms Inc | Junction City, KS 66441 | $600 |
| 16 | Marvin J Poland Trust | Chapman, KS 67431 | $597 |
| 17 | Rodney W Gfeller | Junction City, KS 66441 | $452 |
| 18 | Jack L Swenson | Junction City, KS 66441 | $441 |
| 19 | Warren J Keegan | Rye, NY 10580 | $298 |
| 20 | Daniel J Boller | Junction City, KS 66441 | $249 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf