Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Harper County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,370
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Harper County, Kansas totaled $12,701,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | M & S Francis Farms Inc | Anthony, KS 67003 | $184,785 |
2 | Jeffrey M Parsons | Anthony, KS 67003 | $164,596 |
3 | J & M Ranch Inc | Anthony, KS 67003 | $162,683 |
4 | D & E Farms Partnership | Anthony, KS 67003 | $136,619 |
5 | Frieden Inc | Hazelton, KS 67061 | $127,093 |
6 | Eck Dairy | Sharon, KS 67138 | $117,265 |
7 | Carothers Bros Ptr | Anthony, KS 67003 | $115,585 |
8 | Patterson & Patterson Ptr | Anthony, KS 67003 | $114,928 |
9 | Jeremey Graves | Anthony, KS 67003 | $109,056 |
10 | David R Wedman | Danville, KS 67036 | $108,360 |
11 | Francis Farms Inc | Anthony, KS 67003 | $108,236 |
12 | Curtis And Bobbie Hostetler Trust-curtis Hostetler | Harper, KS 67058 | $107,999 |
13 | Allen R Francis | Anthony, KS 67003 | $106,093 |
14 | D E A Williams Inc | Anthony, KS 67003 | $105,225 |
15 | Cox Farms Inc | Anthony, KS 67003 | $104,084 |
16 | Jelinek Farms Inc | Danville, KS 67036 | $97,234 |
17 | Wheatridge Inc | Freeport, KS 67049 | $93,580 |
18 | Blanchat Farms Inc | Danville, KS 67036 | $92,244 |
19 | Phil Schmidt Inc | Anthony, KS 67003 | $92,173 |
20 | Claud Catlin | Attica, KS 67009 | $87,704 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>