Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Montgomery County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 545
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Montgomery County, Kansas totaled $8,323,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hillcrest Farms Of Kansas Inc | Havana, KS 67347 | $168,984 |
2 | Djk Ranch Lp | Grenola, KS 67346 | $137,851 |
3 | Kaminska Farms Inc | Tyro, KS 67364 | $135,592 |
4 | Johnnie E Henry | Liberty, KS 67351 | $126,941 |
5 | Pickett Ranch LLC | Longton, KS 67352 | $126,066 |
6 | Dave Todd | Havana, KS 67347 | $115,955 |
7 | 2s Land & Cattle Inc | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $112,930 |
8 | Robert Anthony Campbell | Coffeyville, KS 67337 | $107,757 |
9 | Rockin Bar Nothin Ranch Inc | Independence, KS 67301 | $101,358 |
10 | Randel Mccabe | Elk City, KS 67344 | $94,283 |
11 | Prairie Ridge Farms Inc | Elk City, KS 67344 | $93,980 |
12 | Dale R Clubine | Moline, KS 67353 | $92,557 |
13 | Gene & Carletta Denny Rev Living Trust | Caney, KS 67333 | $92,483 |
14 | John L Cannon | Howard, KS 67349 | $81,508 |
15 | Jack Martin | Cherryvale, KS 67335 | $79,456 |
16 | Hiners' H3 Ranch | Independence, KS 67301 | $73,586 |
17 | Russell D Jones | Longton, KS 67352 | $73,481 |
18 | Gary W Cotterill Living Trust | Cherryvale, KS 67335 | $70,801 |
19 | Carol And Shirley Knisley Revocab | Cherryvale, KS 67335 | $70,600 |
20 | J C Wiseman II | Howard, KS 67349 | $68,481 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>