Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Ness County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 74
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Ness County, Kansas totaled $72,410 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Roger A Goodman Trust | Beeler, KS 67518 | $1,506 |
22 | Tim A Goodman Trust | Beeler, KS 67518 | $1,506 |
23 | Verda E Mcquillan | Riverside, CA 92506 | $1,423 |
24 | Evelyn Schlegel | Ness City, KS 67560 | $1,408 |
25 | Wesley P Schlegel Trust | Ness City, KS 67560 | $1,343 |
26 | Karen H Schmalzried | Dighton, KS 67839 | $1,337 |
27 | Ray F Uehling | Ness City, KS 67560 | $1,233 |
28 | Olga I Schultz | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $1,145 |
29 | Ruth A Filbert Trust | Hutchinson, KS 67502 | $992 |
30 | Earl Dean Crosswhite | Ness City, KS 67560 | $923 |
31 | Higgins Trust Twila | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $888 |
32 | Nick Stieben | Bazine, KS 67516 | $786 |
33 | Lenora E Miller Marital Trust | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $775 |
34 | Edna L Schlegel | Ness City, KS 67560 | $715 |
35 | Alex Nichepor Jr | Ness City, KS 67560 | $709 |
36 | Elizabeth D Livingston Trust | Columbus, OH 43220 | $646 |
37 | Wesley Heinrich | Bazine, KS 67516 | $613 |
38 | Regina Flax | Wa Keeney, KS 67672 | $601 |
39 | Rex Huxman | Arnold, KS 67515 | $593 |
40 | Duane Stutz Corp | Utica, KS 67584 | $588 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”