Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Ness County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 74
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Ness County, Kansas totaled $72,410 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Howard Boese Revocable Trust | Brownell, KS 67521 | $4,033 |
| 2 | Ronald Schaben | Bazine, KS 67516 | $3,650 |
| 3 | Endicott-sampson Farms Partnershi | Salina, KS 67401 | $3,448 |
| 4 | John H Payne | Ransom, KS 67572 | $3,118 |
| 5 | Richard Stenzel | Ness City, KS 67560 | $3,077 |
| 6 | Fritzler & Sons Ranch Inc | Ness City, KS 67560 | $2,789 |
| 7 | Sun Terra Inc | Ness City, KS 67560 | $2,674 |
| 8 | Sherry L Moore | Bazine, KS 67516 | $2,661 |
| 9 | Melba Jean Bodecker Rev Tr | Wichita, KS 67206 | $2,598 |
| 10 | Dorothea M Schwindt | San Jose, CA 95138 | $2,478 |
| 11 | Lyle-lyle & Mary Dav V Davison | Ness City, KS 67560 | $2,238 |
| 12 | Louis K Bodecker Rev Living Trust | Wichita, KS 67206 | $2,161 |
| 13 | Loren R Stenzel Trust | Ness City, KS 67560 | $2,009 |
| 14 | Edgar C Frusher | Ness City, KS 67560 | $1,943 |
| 15 | Howard Kerr | Ness City, KS 67560 | $1,898 |
| 16 | Billy Dean Scott | Ransom, KS 67572 | $1,886 |
| 17 | Richard Craig Blocksome | Ransom, KS 67572 | $1,672 |
| 18 | Gus Hinnergardt | Ransom, KS 67572 | $1,628 |
| 19 | Mcvicker Farms Inc | Beeler, KS 67518 | $1,592 |
| 20 | Craig Foos | Bazine, KS 67516 | $1,558 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf