Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Norton County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 75
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Norton County, Kansas totaled $429,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Flying S Partnership | Oberlin, KS 67749 | $43,343 |
2 | Schoen & Schoen Inc | Lenora, KS 67645 | $29,963 |
3 | Monte Montgomery | Almena, KS 67622 | $22,432 |
4 | Whitney Family Farms Gp | Almena, KS 67622 | $19,374 |
5 | Vince Edward Wagoner | Lenora, KS 67645 | $18,787 |
6 | Spring Creek Ranch Inc | Almena, KS 67622 | $17,424 |
7 | Doyle B Schoen Trust B | Norton, KS 67654 | $17,266 |
8 | Big-sky Agri-business LLC | Lenora, KS 67645 | $12,869 |
9 | Juenemann Farms LLC | Norton, KS 67654 | $11,331 |
10 | Richard Clair Dole | Almena, KS 67622 | $10,803 |
11 | Stewart Whitney- Csw Farms LLC | Norton, KS 67654 | $10,519 |
12 | Tim Schulze | Norton, KS 67654 | $10,344 |
13 | Roger E Vanover | Clayton, KS 67629 | $10,047 |
14 | Schulze Farms LLC | Norton, KS 67654 | $10,000 |
15 | Chris A Tanner | Norton, KS 67654 | $9,961 |
16 | Dustin Tyler Harting | Norton, KS 67654 | $9,697 |
17 | Helen L Schoen Tr B | Norton, KS 67654 | $9,278 |
18 | B & J Farms Inc | Clayton, KS 67629 | $8,078 |
19 | Carl Conkey | Edmond, KS 67645 | $7,875 |
20 | Ronald D Jacobson | Loomis, NE 68958 | $7,858 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>