Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Rush County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 374
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Rush County, Kansas totaled $7,448,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Schlegel Land & Cattle Inc | Alexander, KS 67513 | $162,278 |
2 | Holopirek Cattle Company | Timken, KS 67575 | $153,057 |
3 | Terry Conard-conard Living Trust Dated 9-17-16 | Timken, KS 67575 | $147,843 |
4 | J & M Georg Inc | Rush Center, KS 67575 | $142,726 |
5 | James Webs | Alexander, KS 67513 | $116,018 |
6 | John A Koriel | Rush Center, KS 67575 | $112,847 |
7 | Ted Bannister | Hays, KS 67601 | $106,458 |
8 | Harland L Werth | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $100,636 |
9 | Showalter & Sons Inc | Alexander, KS 67513 | $100,474 |
10 | Dennis Gottschalk | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $98,819 |
11 | John Phillip Lohrey | Bison, KS 67520 | $94,514 |
12 | Diamond B Inc | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $84,796 |
13 | Thomas P Moran | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $84,354 |
14 | Jamie Holopirek | Larned, KS 67550 | $84,035 |
15 | Wade P Georg | Rush Center, KS 67575 | $83,662 |
16 | Shelley J Oelkers | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $83,600 |
17 | Bruce J Kershner | Rush Center, KS 67575 | $79,632 |
18 | Leslie A & Sheryl R Rogers Fam Tr | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $78,994 |
19 | R J Tammen | Timken, KS 67575 | $76,373 |
20 | Daryl Maresch | Nekoma, KS 67559 | $72,552 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>