Conservation Reserve Program in Stevens County, Kansas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 427
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Stevens County, Kansas totaled $2,088,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mid America Cattle Co | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $48,722 |
2 | Lewis Wheeler & Lee Wheeler L & L Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $45,480 |
3 | David Bozone Living Tr Dated 2/19/2001 | Wamego, KS 66547 | $43,056 |
4 | Claggett Family LLC | Amarillo, TX 79119 | $24,525 |
5 | Shafer Family Farms LLC | Horseshoe Bay, TX 78657 | $23,360 |
6 | Micheal Willis | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $22,579 |
7 | Shirley Bozone Living Trust | Wamego, KS 66547 | $21,667 |
8 | Timothy J Coulter | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $21,446 |
9 | Bar H Farms LLC | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $20,406 |
10 | United Pentecostal Church | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $19,548 |
11 | Beachner Southwest Farming Co | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $18,964 |
12 | Lloyd Moon | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $18,149 |
13 | Kramer Seed Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $18,133 |
14 | Fenceline Farms LLC | Albuquerque, NM 87108 | $18,110 |
15 | Stephen R Kinser | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $18,035 |
16 | C W Hoffmann Jr Estate | Eastland, TX 76448 | $17,594 |
17 | Wayne Reynolds Trust | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $16,728 |
18 | Evalena Reynolds Trust | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $16,728 |
19 | Dale R Beltz | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $15,341 |
20 | Rome Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $15,175 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>