Loan Deficiency in Wilson County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 914
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Wilson County, Kansas totaled $9,801,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Timmons Brothers | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $300,889 |
2 | Raebern And Deadra Nelson Lvg Trust | Chanute, KS 66720 | $231,145 |
3 | Kc Farms Inc | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $226,910 |
4 | Steven E & Jeanette Miller Lvg Trust | Benedict, KS 66714 | $213,193 |
5 | Estes Farms Inc | Altoona, KS 66710 | $210,604 |
6 | J Kent Finley | Chanute, KS 66720 | $164,521 |
7 | Wildcat Farms Of Altoona Inc | Altoona, KS 66710 | $154,127 |
8 | Nunnenkamp Farms | Altoona, KS 66710 | $148,203 |
9 | Neill Bros Corporation | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $146,650 |
10 | Heritage Farms Of Kansas LLC | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $142,554 |
11 | Melvin D Hare Rev Trust | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $139,939 |
12 | Chester Hobbs | Buffalo, KS 66717 | $127,759 |
13 | Lennis Schultz | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $125,414 |
14 | Small Farms | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $118,844 |
15 | Gudde Farms Inc | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $118,816 |
16 | Jim L & Gyla Jo Mcvey Rev Lvg Trust | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $117,940 |
17 | Travis Miller | Benedict, KS 66714 | $117,085 |
18 | Bradford Grain Co Inc | Chanute, KS 66720 | $116,266 |
19 | Lee & Carol Bradford Lvg Trust | Chanute, KS 66720 | $114,280 |
20 | Milton Clay Braman | Buffalo, KS 66717 | $105,754 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>