Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Woodson County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 165
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Woodson County, Kansas totaled $4,075,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William H Ireland | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $18,946 |
42 | Andrew Lauren Pringle | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $18,867 |
43 | Mark R Grisier | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $18,709 |
44 | Clinton Grisier | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $17,005 |
45 | Jeremy Steinforth | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $16,717 |
46 | David Patterson | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $16,286 |
47 | Jimmie L Quinn | Chanute, KS 66720 | $15,983 |
48 | Brent Dyer | Toronto, KS 66777 | $15,788 |
49 | Amos C Smith | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $15,100 |
50 | Gary Tidd | Piqua, KS 66761 | $14,988 |
51 | Donald Jacobs | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $14,086 |
52 | Tony Diller | Toronto, KS 66777 | $13,990 |
53 | Edward R Fitzpatrick | Neosho Falls, KS 66758 | $13,655 |
54 | Rose Marie Chambers | Tomball, TX 77375 | $13,551 |
55 | Garrett L Eggers | Humboldt, KS 66748 | $13,351 |
56 | Jason Hunt | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $13,171 |
57 | Robert W & Glenna J Wulf Lvg Trust | Humboldt, KS 66748 | $12,650 |
58 | Nancy L Fife - Eagle | Virgil, KS 66870 | $11,908 |
59 | Edwin M Sherman | Toronto, KS 66777 | $11,451 |
60 | Kenneth E Chambers | Burlington, KS 66839 | $11,157 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”