Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Woodson County, Kansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 151
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Woodson County, Kansas totaled $2,499,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Proper Farms LLC | Chanute, KS 66720 | $155,544 |
| 2 | Pierpoint Farms | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $145,810 |
| 3 | Braman Farms, LLC | Buffalo, KS 66717 | $140,004 |
| 4 | Emery R Proper | Chanute, KS 66720 | $116,328 |
| 5 | Brian L Specht | Piqua, KS 66761 | $107,618 |
| 6 | Grisier Farms | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $97,876 |
| 7 | Michael E Holloway | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $79,946 |
| 8 | Jerome Weber | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $77,184 |
| 9 | Ibbetson Brothers LLC | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $75,822 |
| 10 | Sandstone Farms LLC | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $75,367 |
| 11 | Gerald E Weber | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $70,726 |
| 12 | Richard Cummings | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $67,338 |
| 13 | Michael Old | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $66,184 |
| 14 | Henry Eggers | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $65,845 |
| 15 | Kebra Panko | Toronto, KS 66777 | $63,998 |
| 16 | Caden Cummings | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $58,503 |
| 17 | Adam Bradley Splechter | Piqua, KS 66761 | $56,137 |
| 18 | Benjamin D Stockebrand | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $47,159 |
| 19 | John C And Juanita E Mears Living Trust | Chanute, KS 66720 | $46,633 |
| 20 | Daryl Scheibmeir | Piqua, KS 66761 | $45,522 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf