Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Elliott County, Kentucky, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 148
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Elliott County, Kentucky totaled $197,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wendell Simmons | Olive Hill, KY 41164 | $10,311 |
2 | Randal L Miller | Olive Hill, KY 41164 | $8,855 |
3 | Larry Rose | Olive Hill, KY 41164 | $4,730 |
4 | James Allen Prewitt | Sandy Hook, KY 41171 | $4,675 |
5 | Tim Fannin | Sandy Hook, KY 41171 | $4,631 |
6 | Lyda Skaggs | Sandy Hook, KY 41171 | $4,070 |
7 | Glen W Skaggs | Olive Hill, KY 41164 | $3,685 |
8 | Austin Dickerson | Sandy Hook, KY 41171 | $3,630 |
9 | Jason Rose | Olive Hill, KY 41164 | $3,575 |
10 | Herman Conn | Olive Hill, KY 41164 | $3,560 |
11 | Jesse Jenkins | Olive Hill, KY 41164 | $3,300 |
12 | Roger Anthony Wright | Sandy Hook, KY 41171 | $3,175 |
13 | Tracy Donald Kitchen | Sandy Hook, KY 41171 | $3,080 |
14 | James Thomas Barker | Olive Hill, KY 41164 | $2,620 |
15 | Darren Fannin | Sandy Hook, KY 41171 | $2,563 |
16 | William L Skaggs | Sandy Hook, KY 41171 | $2,420 |
17 | John Paul Skaggs | Sandy Hook, KY 41171 | $2,416 |
18 | Steve R Adkins | Sandy Hook, KY 41171 | $2,365 |
19 | Donnie E Cox | Olive Hill, KY 41164 | $2,310 |
20 | Harlan Bear | Olive Hill, KY 41164 | $2,255 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>