Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Montgomery County, Kentucky, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 157
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Montgomery County, Kentucky totaled $242,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Frank Greene | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $12,337 |
2 | 4 M Farms | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $12,337 |
3 | Phillip K Spencer Est | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $4,245 |
4 | Doyle King | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $3,112 |
5 | Alger Thompson Daniel | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $2,583 |
6 | David Roberts | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $2,537 |
7 | Roger L Harvey | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $2,454 |
8 | Thomas G Tipton | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $2,433 |
9 | Jerry Amburgey | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,838 |
10 | Bradley Witt | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,838 |
11 | Roger A Wilson | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,838 |
12 | D Edward Brown | Lexington, KY 40502 | $1,838 |
13 | Rocky A Walton | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,837 |
14 | Lena Jones Hart | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,837 |
15 | Jake Earl Rose | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,837 |
16 | James Tommy Moore | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,837 |
17 | Allen Buck Prewitt | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,837 |
18 | Harold Wayne Witt | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $1,837 |
19 | Ford A Patterson | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,837 |
20 | Stewart Morton | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,837 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>