Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Montgomery County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 19 of 19
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Montgomery County, Kentucky totaled $70,975 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Everett Montgomery | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $14,000 |
2 | Harold Wayne Witt | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $8,477 |
3 | D Edward Brown | Lexington, KY 40502 | $5,500 |
4 | Kevin Tipton | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $4,347 |
5 | Dennie Hawkins | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $3,635 |
6 | Doyle King | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $3,339 |
7 | James Berkley Mark | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $3,239 |
8 | Ford A Patterson | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $3,180 |
9 | John D Judy | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $3,050 |
10 | Sidney Tipton | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $2,832 |
11 | Joe Myers | Harrodsburg, KY 40330 | $2,782 |
12 | O H Caudill Jr | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $2,674 |
13 | Thomas G Tipton | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $2,396 |
14 | Frank Greene | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $2,385 |
15 | Willie Ohair Est | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $2,314 |
16 | Collis Setters | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $2,250 |
17 | Randell Webb | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,725 |
18 | Greg Donaldson | Sharpsburg, KY 40374 | $1,500 |
19 | Robert H Amburgey Jr | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,350 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”