Counter Cyclical Program in Warren County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 932
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Warren County, Kentucky totaled $2,143,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | William Thomas Davenport | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $3,091 |
122 | Wallace M Keown | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $2,936 |
123 | Dorothy Keown | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $2,936 |
124 | Eric Heard | Auburn, KY 42206 | $2,921 |
125 | Darwin Heard | Morgantown, KY 42261 | $2,921 |
126 | Bettie Brawner | Alvaton, KY 42122 | $2,918 |
127 | David C Smith | Lucas, KY 42156 | $2,887 |
128 | Jeff Beckham | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $2,845 |
129 | David Beckham | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $2,845 |
130 | Henry Thomas Smalling | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $2,807 |
131 | A R Hardcastle | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $2,759 |
132 | Fred Devries | Alvaton, KY 42122 | $2,721 |
133 | Tommy S Ennis | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $2,688 |
134 | Harvey H Smith Estate | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $2,688 |
135 | Jerry R Hudnall | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $2,644 |
136 | Ronald Kinser | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $2,562 |
137 | Marty Alan Chandler | Franklin, KY 42134 | $2,562 |
138 | Freda Joyce Ellis | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $2,534 |
139 | Kelly B Hudson | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $2,494 |
140 | Joe Lane Willis | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $2,459 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”