Production Flexibility Program in Warren County, Kentucky, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,386
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Warren County, Kentucky totaled $8,450,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Triple Oaks Farms | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $582,104 |
2 | Hunt Farms Ptr | Bowling Green, KY 42102 | $530,618 |
3 | Charles P Robertson | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $178,863 |
4 | Jimmie Wilson | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $158,632 |
5 | Bush Farms Inc | Rockfield, KY 42274 | $145,804 |
6 | Bgb Corporation | Oakland, KY 42159 | $118,338 |
7 | William Boyd Ballance | Oakland, KY 42159 | $116,857 |
8 | John Ballance | Auburn, KY 42206 | $113,532 |
9 | Emerson Dickerson | Woodburn, KY 42170 | $104,177 |
10 | Bill Jenkins | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $88,131 |
11 | James G Chapman | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $87,880 |
12 | Spinks Farms | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $84,774 |
13 | Terry W Young | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $81,457 |
14 | Mary E Pearson | Oakland, KY 42159 | $79,237 |
15 | William S Crabtree | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $76,788 |
16 | Dale Tucker | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $73,884 |
17 | Vanarsdale Farms Inc | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $73,156 |
18 | Estes Brothers | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $72,601 |
19 | Maurice Heard | Rockfield, KY 42274 | $72,169 |
20 | J Mark Chapman | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $68,589 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>