Conservation Reserve Program in Bossier Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Bossier Parish, Louisiana totaled $426,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mary Louise Roberson | Plain Dealing, LA 71064 | $105,453 |
2 | R P R Limited Partnership | Rayne, LA 70578 | $90,530 |
3 | Morris A Roberson | Plain Dealing, LA 71064 | $41,790 |
4 | Lynn Kruse | Mercedes, TX 78570 | $36,129 |
5 | Estate Of B W Marston | Shreveport, LA 71165 | $32,136 |
6 | David W Foster | Benton, LA 71006 | $23,902 |
7 | Marvis R Grisham | Plain Dealing, LA 71064 | $22,761 |
8 | Kathy Roberson Hart | Hooks, TX 75561 | $22,752 |
9 | Richard D Elston Jr | Shreveport, LA 71115 | $14,146 |
10 | Roy L Pilkinton | Bossier City, LA 71112 | $7,899 |
11 | J Jay Caraway | Bossier City, LA 71111 | $7,743 |
12 | Shannon Mendenhall | Elm Grove, LA 71051 | $4,724 |
13 | Rpr Partners Inc | Crowley, LA 70526 | $4,286 |
14 | James Michael Roberson | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $3,141 |
15 | Mary Louise Roberson Estate | Plain Dealing, LA 71064 | $2,250 |
16 | Thomas A Boggs | Plain Dealing, LA 71064 | $1,810 |
17 | Connie B Rountree | Kingwood, TX 77345 | $1,810 |
18 | Tessie O Pittman | Plain Dealing, LA 71064 | $1,098 |
19 | Amy Louise Pilkinton | Bossier City, LA 71112 | $693 |
20 | Lisa Pilkinton Gable | Bossier City, LA 71112 | $693 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>