Counter Cyclical Program in East Carroll Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 542

Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in East Carroll Parish, Louisiana totaled $41,383,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Counter Cyclical Program
1995-2021
1Condrey FarmsLake Providence, LA 71254$1,596,237
2Michael Brown & SonsLake Providence, LA 71254$1,122,042
3Parker Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$1,095,444
4Jbf PartnershipTransylvania, LA 71286$1,067,068
5Patrick Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$1,002,776
63-b Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$924,077
7Dry Prong Planting CoLake Providence, LA 71254$840,701
8Iii Finger Farm PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$831,362
9Schneider Farming PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$807,622
10W-e Martin FarmsLake Providence, LA 71254$783,252
11Thornton FarmsTransylvania, LA 71286$734,042
12Howard Millikin FarmLake Providence, LA 71254$691,148
13Roberta Planting CoLake Providence, LA 71254$673,432
14Lensing & Harris PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$644,011
15C & C Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$643,856
16Panola Farming PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$622,753
17East Lynn Planting CoLake Providence, LA 71254$562,380
18Robbie Howard FarmsLake Providence, LA 71254$533,448
19Nyanza Planting CompanyLake Providence, LA 71254$431,723
20Millikin Planting CompanyLake Providence, LA 71254$431,722

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag