Counter Cyclical Program in East Carroll Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 542
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in East Carroll Parish, Louisiana totaled $41,383,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Condrey Farms | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $1,596,237 |
2 | Michael Brown & Sons | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $1,122,042 |
3 | Parker Farms Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $1,095,444 |
4 | Jbf Partnership | Transylvania, LA 71286 | $1,067,068 |
5 | Patrick Farms Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $1,002,776 |
6 | 3-b Farms Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $924,077 |
7 | Dry Prong Planting Co | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $840,701 |
8 | Iii Finger Farm Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $831,362 |
9 | Schneider Farming Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $807,622 |
10 | W-e Martin Farms | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $783,252 |
11 | Thornton Farms | Transylvania, LA 71286 | $734,042 |
12 | Howard Millikin Farm | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $691,148 |
13 | Roberta Planting Co | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $673,432 |
14 | Lensing & Harris Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $644,011 |
15 | C & C Farms Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $643,856 |
16 | Panola Farming Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $622,753 |
17 | East Lynn Planting Co | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $562,380 |
18 | Robbie Howard Farms | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $533,448 |
19 | Nyanza Planting Company | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $431,723 |
20 | Millikin Planting Company | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $431,722 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>