Production Flexibility Program in East Carroll Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 658

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in East Carroll Parish, Louisiana totaled $40,880,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2021
1Panola Farming PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$1,267,330
2Michael Brown & SonsLake Providence, LA 71254$1,066,120
3Iii Finger Farm PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$937,496
4East Lynn Planting CoLake Providence, LA 71254$922,394
5Patrick Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$897,820
6Parker Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$897,771
7Lost Ball PartnershipSondheimer, LA 71276$789,196
8James E Gregory And SonsOak Grove, LA 71263$779,035
93-b Farms PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$712,322
10Condrey FarmsLake Providence, LA 71254$684,212
11Howard Millikin FarmLake Providence, LA 71254$652,916
12Jbf PartnershipTransylvania, LA 71286$572,951
13Lensing & Harris PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$565,040
14Dry Prong Planting CoLake Providence, LA 71254$558,250
15Larche Farm PartnershipLake Providence, LA 71254$538,701
16A K Amacker FarmLake Providence, LA 71254$500,942
17Robert N Amacker Jr FarmsLake Providence, LA 71254$500,942
18W-e Martin FarmsLake Providence, LA 71254$474,728
19Kandy FarmsTransylvania, LA 71286$444,960
20Roberta Planting CoLake Providence, LA 71254$440,702

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag