Loan Deficiency in Madison Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 805
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Madison Parish, Louisiana totaled $22,820,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hard Bargain Farms Partnership | Epps, LA 71237 | $681,348 |
2 | Islington Plantation | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $585,767 |
3 | Ashly Plantation | El Dorado, AR 71731 | $547,386 |
4 | Condrey Farms | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $480,940 |
5 | Paxton Farms Partnership | Tallulah, LA 71284 | $465,306 |
6 | V & V Farms | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $457,663 |
7 | Freddie G Truelove | Delhi, LA 71232 | $433,833 |
8 | Marsh Farms | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $391,440 |
9 | Christopher A Truelove | Delhi, LA 71232 | $354,349 |
10 | Jbf Partnership | Transylvania, LA 71286 | $292,160 |
11 | C Top Farms Inc | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $266,386 |
12 | Truman Collins Farms | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $266,209 |
13 | Gerald Collins Farms | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $261,113 |
14 | Chicago Mill & Lumber Co | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $248,101 |
15 | Robert Dalton Fortenberry | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $245,464 |
16 | Ollie Cantrell Jr Farms | Delhi, LA 71232 | $238,887 |
17 | W And J Farms | Delhi, LA 71232 | $235,800 |
18 | Donald Collins Farms | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $224,755 |
19 | Dave Collins Farms | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $206,439 |
20 | Jack & Lila Varner Farms | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $206,435 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>