Total Commodity Programs in Morehouse Parish, Louisiana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 450
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Morehouse Parish, Louisiana totaled $25,245,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Commercial Capital Bank ** | Delhi, LA 71232 | $2,308,510 |
2 | The Mer Rouge State Bank ** | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $1,145,856 |
3 | Clark Farms Joint Venture | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $988,231 |
4 | Schenley Farm Ptrshp | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $988,153 |
5 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $822,743 |
6 | Regions Bank ** | Grenada, MS 38901 | $783,062 |
7 | Stutts Bros Farm Partnership | Bonita, LA 71223 | $694,439 |
8 | Ash More Farm Partnership | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $672,198 |
9 | Commerce Community Bank/wccb ** | Oak Grove, LA 71263 | $636,355 |
10 | Mark Mcleod Farms | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $611,088 |
11 | Barham Stevenson Co | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $558,779 |
12 | Tamarack Planting Co | Monroe, LA 71202 | $446,728 |
13 | Andy Barham Farms | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $338,660 |
14 | Cross Keys Bank ** | Rayville, LA 71269 | $311,645 |
15 | Shackelford Farms Ptn | Bonita, LA 71223 | $310,188 |
16 | M & H Farms | Bastrop, LA 71220 | $309,923 |
17 | Larkin Farms | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $294,767 |
18 | J & S Joint Venture | Bastrop, LA 71220 | $290,059 |
19 | New Ingleside Farming Company II | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $288,163 |
20 | Andy Bunch Farms | Bastrop, LA 71220 | $281,460 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>