Total Commodity Programs in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 176
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Orleans Parish, Louisiana totaled $1,354,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Joann Daigle | Hackberry, LA 70645 | $6,316 |
82 | Ty Tran | Mansfield, TX 76063 | $5,633 |
83 | Kim Thanh II, Inc. | New Orleans, LA 70128 | $5,578 |
84 | St Phaolo Inc | New Orleans, LA 70131 | $5,288 |
85 | Kim Nhi, Inc. | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $5,278 |
86 | Veggi Farmers Cooperative Inc | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $5,134 |
87 | Toan T Phan | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $4,842 |
88 | White Bird Inc | Gretna, LA 70056 | $4,670 |
89 | St Joseph Iv Inc | New Orleans, LA 70131 | $4,539 |
90 | Michael Russell | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $4,417 |
91 | August M Bertoniere Sr | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $4,400 |
92 | Mary Russell | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $4,400 |
93 | Hoa Dinh Nguyen | New Orleans, LA 70128 | $4,399 |
94 | Ca Van Tran | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $4,384 |
95 | Corrine S Mcglamery | New Orleans, LA 70124 | $4,384 |
96 | David W Leleaux | New Orleans, LA 70124 | $4,384 |
97 | Mary Elizabeth Myer | New Orleans, LA 70124 | $4,380 |
98 | Paul A Schmit Jr | Metairie, LA 70006 | $4,374 |
99 | Michael W Daigle | Hackberry, LA 70645 | $4,374 |
100 | Sang Dinh Ho | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $4,374 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”