Total Commodity Programs in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 175
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Orleans Parish, Louisiana totaled $1,347,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flower Town Bonanza, LLC Dba Pistil & Stamen Flowe | New Orleans, LA 70119 | $26,981 |
| 2 | Nightstar Inc | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $22,015 |
| 3 | Double Do Inc | New Orleans, LA 70128 | $21,158 |
| 4 | Le Family Inc | New Orleans, LA 70127 | $19,689 |
| 5 | Hanh X Vo | New Orleans, LA 70128 | $18,593 |
| 6 | Jimmy Le Inc | New Orleans, LA 70128 | $18,283 |
| 7 | Ken K Nguyen | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $16,252 |
| 8 | Nghi Nguyen | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $13,985 |
| 9 | Duc Nguyen | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $12,025 |
| 10 | Hoa-lan Inc | New Orleans, LA 70128 | $12,025 |
| 11 | Lan-huong Inc | New Orleans, LA 70128 | $12,025 |
| 12 | Peaceful Orchid Inc | New Orleans, LA 70128 | $12,025 |
| 13 | Lillian Fishery Inc | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $12,025 |
| 14 | Paul Dinh | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $12,023 |
| 15 | De Van Truong | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $12,022 |
| 16 | Luu X Nguyen | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $12,022 |
| 17 | Can Nguyen | Tomball, TX 77375 | $12,021 |
| 18 | Xe Van Nguyen | New Orleans, LA 70128 | $12,020 |
| 19 | Khong Van Tran | New Orleans, LA 70128 | $12,020 |
| 20 | Le V Tran | New Orleans, LA 70128 | $12,019 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf