Total Commodity Programs in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 176
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Orleans Parish, Louisiana totaled $1,354,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Trang Ngoc Phan | New Orleans, LA 70131 | $4,374 |
142 | St Joseph II Inc | New Orleans, LA 70131 | $4,041 |
143 | Nancy Nguyen | New Orleans, LA 70131 | $4,015 |
144 | Canh Nguyen | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $4,008 |
145 | Thien Tim Tran | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $4,000 |
146 | Nam V Nguyen | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $4,000 |
147 | Francis Tran | New Orleans, LA 70131 | $3,994 |
148 | Cow Apple Horticulture LLC | New Orleans, LA 70117 | $3,800 |
149 | Hop T Tra | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $3,723 |
150 | Xuan P Nguyen | Gretna, LA 70056 | $3,349 |
151 | Excalibur LLC | New Orleans, LA 70114 | $3,292 |
152 | Vinh Nguyen | Lafayette, LA 70506 | $2,520 |
153 | Cecilia Enterprises Inc | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $2,348 |
154 | Soat Thi Nguyen | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $1,797 |
155 | Capt Thanh Inc | New Orleans, LA 70131 | $1,722 |
156 | Oko Vue Produce Co. LLC | New Orleans, LA 70117 | $1,698 |
157 | Hanh V Tran | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $1,642 |
158 | Huu Pham | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $1,626 |
159 | Than Tran | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $1,626 |
160 | Kim Hai Inc | New Orleans, LA 70129 | $1,539 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”