Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Saint Martin Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 50
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Saint Martin Parish, Louisiana totaled $57,426 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | David Mitchell Turner Sr | Arnaudville, LA 70512 | $4,397 |
2 | Daniel Durand | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $4,039 |
3 | Jeffery Durand | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $3,999 |
4 | Donald Angelle | Arnaudville, LA 70512 | $3,879 |
5 | Shane J Rivette | Arnaudville, LA 70512 | $2,655 |
6 | John Hardy | Arnaudville, LA 70512 | $2,655 |
7 | Southland Farms Inc | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $2,650 |
8 | James D Badon | Kaplan, LA 70548 | $2,513 |
9 | Edgar J Durand | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $2,399 |
10 | M Matt Durand | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $2,260 |
11 | Bernard And Lastrapes Farms Inc | Lafayette, LA 70505 | $2,060 |
12 | Glen P Thibodeaux | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $1,842 |
13 | Jeffery M Svendson | Baton Rouge, LA 70808 | $1,737 |
14 | Bulliard Farms Inc | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $1,584 |
15 | Latiolais Farms Inc | Parks, LA 70582 | $1,555 |
16 | Sammy Broussard Jr | New Iberia, LA 70563 | $1,234 |
17 | Kenneth Berard | Saint Martinville, LA 70582 | $1,222 |
18 | Charles M Armentor | Eunice, LA 70535 | $900 |
19 | James L Roy | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $900 |
20 | John H Vincent | Lafayette, LA 70509 | $900 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>