Conservation Reserve Program in Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 6,730
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Maryland totaled $279,774,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | A N Harper & Son | East New Market, MD 21631 | $329,698 |
102 | Lazy Day Farms LLC | Vienna, MD 21869 | $329,485 |
103 | Residuary Trust U/w Of John L Firth | Easton, MD 21601 | $329,306 |
104 | Russell Baker III | Vienna, MD 21869 | $327,928 |
105 | Sandra Y Frazier | Danville, CA 94526 | $324,058 |
106 | Shirley A Brogley | Wilmington, DE 19808 | $322,458 |
107 | Moore Bros Inc | Sudlersville, MD 21668 | $316,279 |
108 | Sans Souci Farm Association Inc | Mcdaniel, MD 21647 | $315,853 |
109 | James L Crothers | Easton, MD 21601 | $313,976 |
110 | Grasslands Plantation Inc | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $309,977 |
111 | Roy G Brooks Sr | Easton, MD 21601 | $309,484 |
112 | Patterson Farms Inc | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $309,127 |
113 | Matthew M Hoff | New Windsor, MD 21776 | $308,137 |
114 | William J Lindner Jr | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $306,188 |
115 | Namroh | Frederick, MD 21703 | $305,222 |
116 | James D Wood | Centreville, MD 21617 | $304,765 |
117 | Victor Wood | Centreville, MD 21617 | $303,391 |
118 | Manor Hill Farm Ltd Ptr | Annapolis, MD 21401 | $303,201 |
119 | John J Hayes Jr | Mount Airy, MD 21771 | $302,865 |
120 | Friends Of Mt Harmon Inc | Elkton, MD 21921 | $302,801 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”