Conservation Reserve Program in Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 6,730
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Maryland totaled $279,774,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Gerret Van S Copeland | Wilmington, DE 19806 | $277,407 |
142 | Daniel Ferrell | Barclay, MD 21607 | $276,224 |
143 | Woodrow H Ward Farm Trust | Annapolis, MD 21409 | $275,864 |
144 | Quiet Acres Farm Inc | Earleville, MD 21919 | $275,683 |
145 | Lands End Farm LLC | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $272,568 |
146 | H James Watson | East New Market, MD 21631 | $267,227 |
147 | Christian Jensen Md | Denton, MD 21629 | $265,569 |
148 | Winifred Riley | Berlin, MD 21811 | $265,475 |
149 | Ashley Hunt-ray Farm | Centreville, MD 21617 | $263,861 |
150 | Philip T Callahan Jr | Centreville, MD 21617 | $263,651 |
151 | James N Ring Sr | Westover, MD 21871 | $263,042 |
152 | John H Brown | Goldsboro, MD 21636 | $262,867 |
153 | Kyffhauser Farm LLC | Church Hill, MD 21623 | $261,930 |
154 | Claude B Anthony Jr Trust | Centreville, MD 21617 | $261,876 |
155 | Gerald Rex Sizemore | Earleville, MD 21919 | $261,621 |
156 | Fern A Rodkey | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $260,732 |
157 | Jonathan D Watters | Church Hill, MD 21623 | $260,427 |
158 | Thomas R Hughes Jr | Easton, MD 21601 | $258,694 |
159 | Greenbrier Farms LLC | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $257,708 |
160 | Charlotte Dujordan | Willards, MD 21874 | $255,283 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”