Farm Subsidy information
Cecil County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Cecil County, Maryland, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 235
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cecil County, Maryland totaled $4,913,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Stephen Whitney Isaacson | Cecilton, MD 21913 | $45,890 |
| 22 | Charles T Craig Jr | Earleville, MD 21919 | $45,707 |
| 23 | Stephen Stoltzfus | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $45,463 |
| 24 | England Farms Inc | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $44,517 |
| 25 | Flying Plow Farm | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $43,082 |
| 26 | Enos Stoltzfus | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $41,376 |
| 27 | William Pleasanton | Middletown, DE 19709 | $39,651 |
| 28 | Peverley-silver LLC | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $38,775 |
| 29 | High Maples Farm LLC | Warwick, MD 21912 | $36,939 |
| 30 | William S Creeger | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $36,289 |
| 31 | David K. Miller | Port Deposit, MD 21904 | $36,089 |
| 32 | Michael Mackie | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $35,956 |
| 33 | Price Investments Lp | Earleville, MD 21919 | $35,550 |
| 34 | Ewing Brothers LLC | Elkton, MD 21921 | $35,341 |
| 35 | Wilkinson Farms Inc | Landenberg, PA 19350 | $35,034 |
| 36 | Levi Z Riehl | Cecilton, MD 21913 | $34,074 |
| 37 | Rich Levels Grain Inc | Galena, MD 21635 | $32,593 |
| 38 | Charles G Robinson | North East, MD 21901 | $32,563 |
| 39 | Steven C Haines | Colora, MD 21917 | $32,481 |
| 40 | Albeck Farms Inc | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $29,866 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf