Farm Subsidy information
Dorchester County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Dorchester County, Maryland, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 428
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dorchester County, Maryland totaled $9,548,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Greenbrier Farms LLC | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $88,908 |
22 | Breckenridge Farms LLC | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $85,543 |
23 | Emerson W Eberspacher Jr | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $84,200 |
24 | Hilmar Helgason | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $83,837 |
25 | Reginald Sellers Jr | Vienna, MD 21869 | $83,195 |
26 | Poplar Hill Farms LLC | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $81,412 |
27 | Elizabeth Handley Nagel-elizabeth H. Nagel Living | Vienna, MD 21869 | $78,325 |
28 | Grove Growers LLC | Vienna, MD 21869 | $77,854 |
29 | George Windsor | East New Market, MD 21631 | $75,822 |
30 | Gable Lane Farms LLC | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $75,630 |
31 | Labrador Farms LLC | Vienna, MD 21869 | $74,641 |
32 | Robert N Taylor | Federalsburg, MD 21632 | $74,579 |
33 | John R Windsor | East New Market, MD 21631 | $73,765 |
34 | Barnett Farms, LLC | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $73,614 |
35 | Walnut Hill Farms Inc | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $71,123 |
36 | Shell, LLC | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $70,502 |
37 | Anne R Windsor | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $69,083 |
38 | Jeffrey King | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $59,778 |
39 | Harold Travers | Madison, MD 21648 | $59,755 |
40 | Howard Clyde Harding Estate | Easton, MD 21601 | $57,888 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”