Total Commodity Programs in Dorchester County, Maryland, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 250
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Dorchester County, Maryland totaled $6,477,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Reid Farms Inc | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $677,554 |
2 | B & K Farms LLC | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $274,083 |
3 | Clearview Farms Inc | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $194,669 |
4 | Turner Farms Inc | Federalsburg, MD 21632 | $180,388 |
5 | A N Harper & Son | East New Market, MD 21631 | $168,835 |
6 | R C Farms Inc | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $132,197 |
7 | Lazy Day Farms LLC | Vienna, MD 21869 | $115,081 |
8 | James D Payne Jr | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $114,947 |
9 | Trice Farms Inc | Preston, MD 21655 | $112,786 |
10 | Wootten Farms LLC | Seaford, DE 19973 | $112,231 |
11 | Harold Travers Jr | Madison, MD 21648 | $109,495 |
12 | G Philip Jackson Jr | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $109,248 |
13 | Holly Lane Farms Inc | Church Creek, MD 21622 | $99,648 |
14 | Max M Schnoor Jr | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $99,162 |
15 | Ronald C Edgar & Sons LLC Dba Riverdale Farms | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $96,949 |
16 | Baker Boys Farm Service Inc | Vienna, MD 21869 | $92,207 |
17 | Garrett Daniel Luthy | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $89,487 |
18 | Breckenridge Farms LLC | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $85,543 |
19 | W A Harper & Son | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $84,897 |
20 | Hilmar Helgason | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $81,440 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>