Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Dorchester County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 68
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Dorchester County, Maryland totaled $83,555 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Reid Farms Inc | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $17,532 |
2 | Chris Nagel | Vienna, MD 21869 | $16,056 |
3 | Helen M Malkus Estate | Cheverly, MD 20785 | $3,681 |
4 | Baker Boys Farm Service Inc | Vienna, MD 21869 | $3,363 |
5 | Michelle A Goehringer | Easton, MD 21601 | $3,264 |
6 | A N Harper & Son | East New Market, MD 21631 | $3,223 |
7 | Elizabeth Handley Nagel-elizabeth H. Nagel Living | Vienna, MD 21869 | $2,978 |
8 | Malcolm T Knopp Jr | Federalsburg, MD 21632 | $2,775 |
9 | Deborah L Outten | Vienna, MD 21869 | $2,618 |
10 | Adam Kral | East New Market, MD 21631 | $2,608 |
11 | W A Harper & Son | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $2,461 |
12 | H James Watson | East New Market, MD 21631 | $2,003 |
13 | Clearview Farms Inc | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $1,421 |
14 | Greenfield Farms LLC | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $1,277 |
15 | Wootten Farms LLC | Seaford, DE 19973 | $1,260 |
16 | Loyal Purpose Farms Inc | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $1,187 |
17 | Grove Growers LLC | Vienna, MD 21869 | $1,050 |
18 | Hilmar Helgason | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $864 |
19 | Andrews Family Farms LLC | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $751 |
20 | J Edward Powell | East New Market, MD 21631 | $742 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>