Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Harford County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 93
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Harford County, Maryland totaled $1,035,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brad's Produce LLC | Churchville, MD 21028 | $106,319 |
2 | Grimmel Farm Partners | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $92,763 |
3 | Stephen T Pieper | White Hall, MD 21161 | $90,071 |
4 | Blue Valley Farms LLC | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $43,749 |
5 | Thomas Adams III | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $37,365 |
6 | Maurice L Jones | Street, MD 21154 | $34,746 |
7 | Holloway Brothers Ptr | Darlington, MD 21034 | $32,839 |
8 | Rigdon Farms Inc | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $28,570 |
9 | My Girls Glen Inc | Darlington, MD 21034 | $27,223 |
10 | Thomas Harman | Churchville, MD 21028 | $26,130 |
11 | My Lady's Manor Farm Inc | Monkton, MD 21111 | $24,936 |
12 | John Magness | Joppa, MD 21085 | $22,539 |
13 | Ma & Pa Farms LLC | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $21,492 |
14 | Douglas H Smith Jr | Street, MD 21154 | $21,072 |
15 | Ralph B Ball | Churchville, MD 21028 | $20,190 |
16 | William Thomas Moore Jr | Churchville, MD 21028 | $19,188 |
17 | Gregory Wilson | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $18,981 |
18 | David A Hopkins | Havre De Grace, MD 21078 | $16,263 |
19 | Flintville Farms | Whiteford, MD 21160 | $15,384 |
20 | James H Archer Jr | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $14,930 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>